EEMCS EPrints Service
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Chong, Chuen Ngen and Etalle, S. and Hartel, P.H.
(2003)
Comparing Logic-based and XML-based Rights Expression Languages.
In: Confederated Int. Workshops: On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems (OTM), Catania, Sicily, Italy.
pp. 779-792.
Springer-Verlag.
ISBN 3-540-20494-6
Full text available as:
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39962-9_78 AbstractSeveral rights expression languages (RELs) have been proposed to describe licenses governing the terms and conditions of content access. In this field XrML and ODRL play a prominent role. Both languages are powerful yet complex. We propose a way of analysing RELs and we apply it to ODRL, XrML and to LicenseScript, a REL we propose. In addition, we test these languages against a number of example scenarios. These examples bring new insights, and shed new light on some of the limits of XrML and ODRL.
Export this item as: To correct this item please ask your editor Repository Staff Only: edit this item |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||