Nederlands
Contact
Sitemap
Search
OrganisationEEMCS EPrints Service
 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Bistarelli, S. and Cervesato, I. and Lenzini, G. and Martinelli, F.
(2005)
Relating Multiset Rewriting and Process Algebras for Security Protocol Analysis.
Journal of Computer Security, 13 (1).
pp. 3-47.
ISSN 0926-227x
Full text available as:
Official URL: http://iospress.metapress.com/link.asp?id=recdra67mg8nlfcj  AbstractWhen formalizing security protocols, different specification languages support very different reasoning methodologies, whose results are not directly or easily comparable. Therefore, establishing clear mappings among different frameworks is highly desirable, as it permits various methodologies to cooperate by interpreting theoretical and practical results of one system into another. In this paper, we examine the relationship between two general verification frameworks: multiset rewriting (MSR) and a process algebra (PA) inspired to CCS and the -calculus. Although defining a simple and general bi-jection between MSR and PA appears difficult, we show that the sublanguages needed to specify cryptographic protocols admit an effective translation that is not only trace-preserving, but also induces a correspondence relation between the two languages. In particular, the correspondence sketched in this paper permits transferring several important trace-based properties such as secrecy and many forms of authentication.
Export this item as: To correct this item please ask your editor Repository Staff Only: edit this item |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
