EEMCS

Home > Publications
Home University of Twente
Education
Research
Prospective Students
Jobs
Publications
Intranet (internal)
 
 Nederlands
 Contact
 Search
 Organisation

EEMCS EPrints Service


27063 A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation
Home Policy Brochure Browse Search User Area Contact Help

Meuwly, D. and Ramos, D. and Haraksim, R. (2017) A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation. Forensic Science International. pp. 1-12. ISSN 0379-0738 *** ISI Impact 1,950 ***

Full text available as:

PDF

629 Kb
Open Access



Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.048

Exported to Metis

Abstract

This Guideline proposes a protocol for the validation of forensic evaluation methods at the source level, using the Likelihood Ratio framework as defined within the Bayes’ inference model. In the context of the inference of identity of source, the Likelihood Ratio is used to evaluate the strength of the evidence for a trace specimen, e.g. a fingermark, and a reference specimen, e.g. a fingerprint, to originate from common or different sources.
Some theoretical aspects of probabilities necessary for this Guideline were discussed prior to its elaboration, which started after a workshop of forensic researchers and practitioners involved in this topic. In the workshop, the following questions were addressed: ‘‘which aspects of a forensic evaluation scenario need to be validated?’’, ‘‘what is the role of the LR as part of a decision process?’’ and ‘‘how to deal with uncertainty in the LR calculation?’’. The questions: ‘‘what to validate?’’ focuses on the validation methods and criteria and ‘‘how to validate?’’ deals with the implementation of the validation protocol.
Answers to these questions were deemed necessary with several objectives. First, concepts typical for validation standards [1], such as performance characteristics, performance metrics and validation criteria, will be adapted or applied by analogy to the LR framework. Second, a validation strategy will be defined. Third, validation methods will be described. Finally, a validation protocol and an example of validation report will be proposed, which can be applied to the forensic fields developing and validating LR methods for the evaluation of the strength of evidence at source level under the following propositions: H1/Hss: The trace and reference originate from the same source.
H2/Hds: The trace and reference originate from different sources.

Item Type:Article
Research Group:EWI-SCS: Services, Cyber security and Safety
Research Program:CTIT-General
Research Project:FFR: Forensic Face Recognition, FRDM: Face recognition, deduplication and morphing
Uncontrolled Keywords:Method validation, Automatic interpretation method, Strength of evidence Accreditation, Validation report
ID Code:27063
Status:Online pre-publication
Deposited On:08 July 2016
Refereed:Yes
International:Yes
ISI Impact Factor:1,950
More Information:statisticsmetis

Export this item as:

To correct this item please ask your editor

Repository Staff Only: edit this item