EEMCS EPrints Service
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Aly, R.B.N. and Hiemstra, D.
(2009)
Concept detectors: how good is good enough?
In: Proceeding of the 17th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 19-22 Oct 2009, Beijing, P.R. Republic of China.
pp. 233-242.
ACM.
ISBN 978-1-60558-608-3
Full text available as:
Official URL: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1631272.1631306 ![]() AbstractToday, semantic concept based video retrieval systems often show insufficient performance for real-life applications. Clearly, a big share of the reason is the lacking performance of the detectors of these concepts. While concept detectors are on their endeavor to improve, following important questions need to be addressed: ``How good do detectors need to be to produce usable search systems?'' and ``How does the detector performance influence different concept combination methods?''. We use Monte Carlo Simulations to provide answers to the above questions. The main contribution of this paper is a probabilistic model of detectors which outputs confidence scores to indicate the likelihood of a concept to occur. This score is also converted into a posterior probability and a binary classification. We investigate the influence of changes to the model's parameters on the performance of multiple concept combination methods. Current web search engines produce a mean average precision (MAP) of around
Export this item as: To request a copy of the PDF please email us request copy To correct this item please ask your editor Repository Staff Only: edit this item |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
